The iPhone Duo marks Apple’s debut in the foldable segment, with a starting price of $1,999 and a dual‑screen layout of 5.4‑inch outer and 7.6‑inch inner panels. It runs on Apple’s A20 Pro processor within the iOS 27 ecosystem, positioning it at the high end of both price and performance.
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 8 offers a direct, slightly cheaper alternative at $1,899. It features a 5.5‑inch outer display and a 7.6‑inch inner screen, matching the iPhone Duo’s inner size. Under the hood it runs the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy, paired with 12 GB of RAM and a 4,800 mAh battery, delivering what the source describes as “one of the best hardware in the category.”
Motorola’s Razr Fold also starts at $1,899 and follows a book‑style design with a 6.6‑inch outer screen that expands to an 8.1‑inch inner panel. It packs 16 GB of RAM, 512 GB of storage, a 6,000 mAh battery, and three 50‑megapixel rear cameras. The device supports 80 W wired and 50 W wireless charging, outpacing the iPhone Duo’s 60 W wired charging capability.
Google’s Pixel 11 Pro Fold, priced around $1,899, runs on the Tensor G6 processor with 16 GB of RAM. Its 6.5‑inch outer and 8‑inch inner displays are larger than the iPhone Duo’s, and the phone includes Android‑specific foldable features such as Split Screen, Drag‑and‑Drop and Instant View, along with AI‑driven camera tools.
For a more budget‑friendly option, Motorola’s Razr Ultra (2026) starts at $1,499. This flip‑style device uses a Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 16 GB of RAM, and a 5,000 mAh battery. Its main screen measures 7 inches with a 4‑inch outer display, offering greater portability at the cost of a smaller unfolded workspace.
The source explains that the selection criteria focused on models priced below the iPhone Duo’s $1,999 launch price while delivering a premium experience. Devices such as the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra were excluded because its $2,099 price exceeds Apple’s offering.
These alternatives give consumers a range of foldable smartphones that combine high‑end specifications with lower price tags, potentially tempering the market impact of Apple’s premium‑priced entry and expanding choice for users who prefer Android ecosystems or more portable designs.