Trump administration seeks to resume Big Bend border construction

The Trump administration asked a judge to allow border infrastructure construction in Texas's Big Bend region while it appeals a court order blocking the work, Associated Press reported on October 9.

Construction is paused under a temporary court order. Landowners and other opponents challenge exemptions from environmental and other requirements. In its filing late on October 8, the administration argued that insufficiently fortified sections could draw illegal immigration and smuggling away from neighbouring areas.

The government plans to spend $7.5 billion on infrastructure along more than 800 kilometres of border in Big Bend. It forms part of a $46 billion programme to strengthen the US–Mexico border. Work in the region began in September.

US Customs and Border Protection says walls, vehicle barriers, roads and surveillance are needed to keep illegal crossings low. In August, Border Patrol arrested 8,870 people across the southern border, including 161 in Big Bend, which accounts for roughly a quarter of its length.

Much of the Texas land is privately or state owned. CBP seeks permission to survey and build. If agreements fail, it can refer disputes to the Justice Department. The agency says owners will receive compensation regardless of how access is obtained.

The No Big Bend Wall Coalition says its network includes more than 200 landowners. Some refuse contractor access, attend county meetings and prepare court challenges. Dianna and Dan Burbach fear worsening floods and about six hectares of their property being left behind the wall.

Opponents include some Republicans who voted for Trump. Terrell County Sheriff Thad Cleveland, a 26-year Border Patrol veteran, considers drones and surveillance towers better suited to the terrain. Rancher Laura Allen credits Trump with reducing crossings but questions the need for multibillion-dollar barriers.

How long construction remains paused is still being contested. The administration's request to suspend the injunction does not itself authorise work to resume.