Indian consumer panel orders hospital to compensate patient over wrong blood transfusion

A consumer commission in Chhattisgarh ordered a hospital and two doctors to pay Rs 5.1 lakh after a patient with B-positive blood received AB-positive blood.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Chhattisgarh has ordered a hospital and two doctors to pay Madhu Khakha Rs 5.1 lakh. The commission found that she received AB-positive blood during treatment after a road accident even though her blood group was B-positive. Its September 29, 2026, order held the hospital and doctors responsible for negligence and deficiency in service. They must pay Rs 5 lakh for mental agony and Rs 10,000 in legal expenses within 45 days.
According to the case record, Khakha was travelling from Bilaspur to Raipur with her daughter and other relatives on February 16, 2014, when their car collided with a truck. She suffered a thigh fracture and was taken to Balaji Institute of Medical Sciences. A hospital test the next day listed her blood group as AB-positive, and staff arranged three units of that type. Khakha said she had told staff her group was B-positive. She reported shivering and vomiting soon after the transfusion began and later lost consciousness. The transfusion was stopped; she was subsequently told the blood group was incompatible and her surgery would be postponed.
The hospital and doctors denied negligence. They said she had other serious injuries, her condition was unstable and complications could have affected the test results. The commission compared the hospital report of February 17, which listed AB-positive, with a test dated February 20 that showed B-positive. An expert from the district hospital in Pandri told the commission that medical circumstances could not change a person’s blood group. The commission also found no medical evidence supporting the hospital’s claim that only two to five drops had been transfused before the reaction.
Khakha had sought Rs 19 lakh in compensation and a refund of Rs 25,000 paid on admission. The commission considered the larger claim excessive and declined to order a refund without a receipt. It partly allowed the complaint and made the hospital and doctors jointly and severally liable for Rs 5 lakh and Rs 10,000 in legal costs. The commission noted that an incompatible transfusion can cause a severe, potentially fatal reaction if treatment is not provided promptly.
