Philologists offer contrasting views on Anne Carson's Nobel Prize

Writer Andrey Astvatsaturov and translator Maria Golovanivskaya offered different assessments of Anne Carson's 2026 Nobel Prize in Literature in comments published by RBC on Oct. 9.

Astvatsaturov, a Saint Petersburg State University professor, described the Canadian poet's award as deserved. He highlighted her combination of lyric and epic elements and her use of Greek myths and ancient poets' discoveries in contemporary free verse.

He considered the choice of a poet particularly significant because, in his view, poetry helps prevent language from ageing. He also said he saw no political motive and regarded the decision as an assessment of Carson's literary language.

Golovanivskaya, founder of the Good Text school, acknowledged the quality of Carson's writing but was more reserved. She noted its combination of classical imagery and modern form, arguing that other writers also use that approach. In her assessment, Carson's works would not necessarily inspire widespread reader enthusiasm.

The award was announced on Oct. 8. The Swedish Academy recognized Carson's inventiveness, engagement with classical tradition and creation of new literary forms. The commentators' reactions reflect their artistic preferences rather than any change to the award.